MIGRATION, WARS AND OTHER SYMPTOMS OF COLLAPSE
This is the third post this week on the topic of the collapse of North Western Europe (link, link). A large part of the problem is immigration, another is the economic situation, the blind financial and moral support of the disastrous war in Ukraine against Russia and the hatred channeled through sanctions that are hurting the sanctioners more than the sanctioned. Then there's intellectual bankruptcy, and societies permanently in the brink of civil war. One of the problems preventing a solution is the siloing of these issues, devoid of context. Or we would understand that these things are related and symptoms of a larger problem. Usually we are focusing here on the ideas behind the actions on the ground. But there are specific groups of people, mainly clustered in academia, politics and other power centers, that have been promoting and disseminating these destructive ideas. And more importantly, turning them into policies. Before we dive into Tucker Carlson's latest interview that touches on some of the symptoms, it is well worth watching part of Jay Dyer's live stream from last night, partly on the nature of Fabian Socialism.
Aug 28, 2025 Jay Dyer: Demonic Psychosis, Socialist Collapse & WEF Papacy & Predictive Films (on Fabian Socialism: mark 1:20-1:28).
It is no wonder that people are so confused. For decades after the World War 2 they have been setting us up against each other as the political Left versus Right amid inflammable references to Communism and Fascism as its respective bogeys.
We have Ayn Rand to thank for the insight that these ideologies are not opponents, but two sides of the same coin, both battling each other for who has the most effective form of Socialism. But of course denial was everywhere.
And here comes Dyer telling us that World Socialism and World Capitalism are part of the same strategy. It's not Marxist Socialism versus the Capitalism of free market Libertarians. (This explains why Libertarianism has always seemed the dumbest ideology around.)
Which is precisely what Michael Malice has been telling us in a video post earlier week: Libertarianism is not capitalism, but the outcome of Marxism (link)! It is the falling away of the state and all authority, which is more accurately called anarchy. But an appeal to liberty sells better!
Dyer states who is the actual target of this salami tactic Fabianism: not the power of capitalism, but the power of the Church. Which was of course also the target of many of the Enlightenment Revolutions, like the French Revolution and the Spanish Civil War (link).
We have to ask ourselves, what is the power of the Church that is so dangerous to the cabal? According the Classical state craft our actions are guided by two sources of authority: Secular Authority represented by the laws of the state, and Sacred Authority, the collective ethnic and cultural customs and traditions of the nation, including religion, philosophy, etc. (More)
In other words, Sacred Authority is the source of morality, everything that is not guided by the law of the land. Think about it. Are our globalist tyrants the kind of people who are willing to share power with a rival authority based on objective morality? Of course not! They want all power to themselves!
Dyer makes it all make sense as he explains they have all been clustering together in post World War 2 institutions like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the UN, the EU, the World Bank, the IMF, the Bilderbergs, etc. etc. Globalism is the correct framing.
Aug. 27, 2025 TCN: Christopher Caldwell: How Immigration Is Erasing Whites, Christians, and the Middle Class.
Through that lens the issues discussed between Caldwell and Carlson, make much more sense. As Mike Benz (link) has been explaining repeatedly, 'democracy' has come to mean, not Government by the people, but Government by the post World War 2 institutions.
It is only with the rise of Donald Trump and the MAGA movement that the traditional 'Left' and 'Right' wing issues have started to shift so dramatically, that the cover has been blown. Of course, nobody could have predicted such a development
That's why the best way for now to help the situation, is to jump off Hegel's rat wheel that sets the parties up against each other. It is hard to change the habit of a life time, yet it has to be done. Don't define yourself by what the 'opponent' is or is not, or support the other side of an argument as if you were an automaton.
I am old enough to remember that people were still capable of judging an issue in context and on its merits. It is an art we shall have to re-learn. Leave the labels, which is a nominalist fallacy anyway, that implies that words are meaningless.
Comments
Post a Comment