PSYOP: HOW TO CREATE A CUTTING EDGE TECH CARTEL?

You may have noticed: nothing is real, everything is fake. Nothing is organic, everything is manufactured. The latest psy-op follows a familiar pattern. The playbook is always the same. The stakes with regard to money and power have never been greater. The backdrop of the present theater piece are the US midterm elections, with the Democrats most sympathetic to regulation. This happens amidst the biggest investment drive ever for the latest cutting edge technology, what is referred to as "artificial intelligence". Read here our latest article on this issue, explaining what AI is and what it is not (link). Last week a so-called "whistleblower" dropped out of the sky to warn the world about the dangers of AI (link). "We're all gonna die!" he declared. So what's going on?













A fake "philanthropic" setup called Coefficient Giving (formerly Open Philanthropy) (CG) is the foremost funder of AI alarmism, with more than $1B in grants and $1B committed for 2026. In 2017 a co-founder took a board seat at OpenAI, donating $30M. He is married to Anthropic's president, Daniela Amodei. He then joined Anthropic in January 2025.

Coxon, the "whistleblower" received a scholarship from Good Ventures, which is the foundation that funds CG. Coxon coordinated his message ahead of time with the Wall Street Journal, which published its exclusive on him before he posted on X.

Coxon spent three years pretraining at OpenAI, the company that took $30M from CG. The funder of the CG, in other words, is also an owner of Anthropic, and his organization is deeply entangled with both OpenAI and Anthropic. Anthropic's researchers in turn amplified Coxon.

The same people who own the organizations that advocate for regulation, in other words, are those who own the companies that would dominate the market under that regulatory regime, which would prevent competitors from entering the market.

And this work all started ten years ago. The plan: win at the competition, then deploy activists to help you regulate the market and ensure your monopoly. (Source)

Note the roles of so called Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), non profits, philanthropists and activists in recent decades. They are nothing but political pressure groups with less charitable agendas. And that includes faith based organizations!

Here are some of the reactions to the scheme. Not to be outdone, 40 British MPs have signed a letter to Prime Minister Andy Burnham calling for a ban on the development of super intelligent AI.

The globalists are at it again. But reactions are coming in fast and furious. Everyone knows by now how the playbook works.


Well worth your attention is an article (link) by Andrew Torba, founder and CEO of social media platform GAB. Particularly fascinating is his argument from the Christian perspective against the prevailing, utilitarian principle that man derives his intrinsic value as a person, from his usefulness to the economy.

A great deal of the panic surrounding AI comes from precisely this mistake. People were taught that their value consisted of being useful, intelligent, productive members of the economy. Now they are watching software perform tasks that once gave them a sense of importance and they are discovering how little that account of human life actually offered them. When your entire identity rests on what you can produce a machine that produces more efficiently starts to look like an argument against your existence. Christianity never accepted those terms.

Comments

Popular Posts