SCIENCE AT A CROSSROAD: TRUTH OR IDEOLOGY

In an episode of Socrates in the City, Eric Metaxas talked with Denis Noble, a brilliant physiologist and biologist, who challenges one of the most deeply rooted assumptions in modern science: that everything can ultimately be reduced to its smallest parts. From the rise of reductionism in biology and mathematics to the influential “selfish gene” theory, Noble examines how a particular scientific framework has come to shape our understanding of life itself. Drawing on his own experience debating Richard Dawkins—and even serving on the committee for Dawkins’s PhD thesis—Noble offers a fascinating insider’s perspective on one of the most significant debates in modern evolutionary biology. 

Aug. 27, 2026 Socrates in the City: Why We Have Been Misled About Biology for 80 Years | Denis Noble.

They ask, what happens when scientists refuse to follow the evidence wherever it may lead, even if that evidence raises questions about God? Noble argues that science is never merely scientific; it is deeply philosophical, shaped by the assumptions we bring to our understanding of reality.

For decades the elephant in the room of science has been the gap between macro physics and quantum physics. On the macro level everything is ruled by cosmic laws, predictability and mathematics.

But that conventional wisdom of science breaks down on the micro level, that is ruled by chaos, instability and unpredictability. The challenge to bring these two incompatible realities together is referred to as "the theory of everything".

But now Denis Noble has brought biology to the same place as quantum physics and was attacked for it by colleagues who are more ideologue than scientist, more attached to careers, grants, and power than they are to the pursuit of truth and science. 

Noble discovered that life has the ability to find a way through chaos (stochasticity). That means there is purpose. Noble mentions numbers in chance predictability that are beyond human imagination. What rapidly takes us into the territory of Intelligent Design (link). 

Next to bringing creation into the field, another threshold that conventional science does not want to cross is epigenetics, pejoratively referred to as "Lamarqueism". 

Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744–1829) was a pioneering French biologist and naturalist. He proposed an early theory of evolution suggesting that organisms acquire traits during their lifetime and pass them to offspring.

It explains the phenomenon of a mother cat that lost one of its paws in an accident and continued to produce offspring with missing paws. 

Denis Noble has had more than one debate with the champion of the now defunct movement called Neo Atheism, Richard Dawkins who recently became a "cultural Christian" and even more recently became the laughing stock for falling in love with an AI (link).

Noble recounts Dawkins objecting to multiple levels of causation, because that would suggest hierarchy. And instances of colleagues revealing their reductionist agenda with their attitude towards philosophy: "If we brought philosophy into science we would never make any progress!"

So progress and the continuation of Enlightenment dogma is the holy grail here, not the discovery of truth or reality. But that is hardly a surprise or anything new. But the era of ideologies is coming to a close. And everyone can sense it. 

Lecture by Denis Noble: "Neo-Darwinism Is Dead" | We Need A Biology Beyond Genes (link). 

- More on Eric Metaxas, Richard Dawkins, New Atheism, physics, genetics, biology, Darwinism, evolution, Intelligent Design -