PROTO INDO EUROPEAN: ARYAN THEORY IN A NEW COAT

If you have opened a dictionary or a thesaurus latetly you might have noticed a new feature. The reduction of words to P.I.E. This abbreviation  stands for the Proto Indo European root of the word. It is reaching into the mists of time, somewhere around 10,000 to 5,000 BC, when humanity transitioned from his hunter-gatherer foundations to the domestication of animals and agriculture. It must be obvious to anyone, this must necessarily be a highly speculative undertaking. For example Etymology.com reduces the word 'seed' to 'se: to sow' (link). I set more store by astrology! Yet, suddenly P.I.E. is all over the place. In linguistics, but also in slick productions related to history and genetics relying heavily on AI for its illustrations. So, what's going on here? 


It was a mystery to me as well, until I sent this tweet into the world, off topic, but strangely entirely related: the cultural vandalism of 'the cradle' of Western civilization. This triggered a stream of reactions that revealed the whole thing. 

Long story short. The introduction of P.I.E. is nothing but an academic rehash of the old Aryan theory. Firmly discredited now of course. The frame is different, but the basis of the theory is the same. 

The detractors bring up Grok to prove their legitimacy, but  since AIs are trained on the same material, this is hardly a surprise. But if you pose a few well directed questions, this prompts the following information from AI.

"The Aryan Invasion/Migration Theory is a specific historical narrative proposing that Indo-European-speaking pastoralists migrated into India around 1500 BCE, displacing or subjugating indigenous populations and introducing Vedic culture and Sanskrit.

"In contrast, the Indo-European Theory (or Indo-European hypothesis) is the broader, linguistically grounded scientific framework asserting that Sanskrit, Persian, and most European languages descend from a common ancestral language (Proto-Indo-European) spoken in the Eurasian steppes, without necessarily implying a violent invasion or a specific racial identity.

"This belief system, rooted in 19th-century racial anthropology and distorted by Adolf Hitler, posited that Aryans were the sole creators of civilization and that their purity required protection from "inferior" groups.

"Modern Indo-European studies explicitly reject the racial dimensions of the older Aryan paradigm. While 19th-century proponents like Max Müller and Arthur de Gobineau used "Aryan" to denote a superior biological race, contemporary scholarship uses "Indo-European" as a neutral, non-racial term for language families, acknowledging that DNA and linguistic evidence show complex admixture rather than simple replacement."

So they don't base themselves on race, but instead concentrate on linguistics to make the same point!

What is the purpose of this exercise, you might ask? The European Union has aspirations to become a country, a construct that can compete with the United State of America. It needs legitimacy.

The unity of the USA is based on civic nationalism: shared values. It would seem that the EU has understood that shared values need a base in reality as well. Here they are! No wonder they harking back to a common root. Now it's fake proto linguistics


This was all prompted by the "off topic but strangely related" issue of the vandalism of Greece's heritage. Since Greece is the considered "the cradle" of Western civilization, of course it is the target of a demolition campaign.

This was Hollywood; wait until academia joins the fray! Perhaps they already have...

A tiger does not lose its stripes, folks! 


Comments

Popular Posts